Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Reduces Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 5 Years

Background Although hip arthroplasty reliably relieves pain and improves function, problems have arisen with wear and osteolysis. Highly crosslinked polyethylene has been developed to address this problem although at present there is limited clinical evidence it does so longer term. Questions/purpos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2010-12, Vol.468 (12), p.3228-3233
Hauptverfasser: Mutimer, Jonathan, Devane, Peter A., Adams, Kathryn, Horne, J. Geoffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although hip arthroplasty reliably relieves pain and improves function, problems have arisen with wear and osteolysis. Highly crosslinked polyethylene has been developed to address this problem although at present there is limited clinical evidence it does so longer term. Questions/purposes We compared the in vivo wear of standard versus highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLP) in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of 5-year followup. Methods We enrolled 122 patients in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial and followed them annually to assess their progress. Annual radiographs were analyzed using previously validated edge detection software to assess for two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and volumetric wear. The mean follow up was 5.5 years (range, 4.1 to 7 years). Results The two-dimensional wear measurements for HXLP showed lower wear compared to the conventional group (0.05 mm/year versus 0.26 mm/year, respectively). Three-dimensional and volumetric wear were similarly lower in the HXLP group. Conclusions Highly crosslinked polyethylene undergoes substantially less wear than conventional polyethylene at medium term. The effect of hip arthroplasty longevity will need to be assessed with longer-term studies, but this may lead to a decreased need for revision as a result of less wear and osteolysis. Level of Evidence Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ISSN:0009-921X
1528-1132
DOI:10.1007/s11999-010-1379-4