Level of G protein–Coupled Receptor Kinase-2 Determines Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via Pro- and Anti-Apoptotic Mechanisms

RATIONALE:Activation of prosurvival kinases and subsequent nitric oxide (NO) production by certain G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) protects myocardium in ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R) models. GPCR signaling pathways are regulated by GPCR kinases (GRKs), and GRK2 has been shown to be a critic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation research 2010-10, Vol.107 (9), p.1140-1149
Hauptverfasser: Brinks, Henriette, Boucher, Matthieu, Gao, Erhe, Chuprun, J Kurt, Pesant, Stéphanie, Raake, Philip W, Huang, Z Maggie, Wang, Xiaoliang, Qiu, Gang, Gumpert, Anna, Harris, David M, Eckhart, Andrea D, Most, Patrick, Koch, Walter J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:RATIONALE:Activation of prosurvival kinases and subsequent nitric oxide (NO) production by certain G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) protects myocardium in ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R) models. GPCR signaling pathways are regulated by GPCR kinases (GRKs), and GRK2 has been shown to be a critical molecule in normal and pathological cardiac function. OBJECTIVE:A loss of cardiac GRK2 activity is known to arrest progression of heart failure (HF), at least in part by normalization of cardiac β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) signaling. Chronic HF studies have been performed with GRK2 knockout mice, as well as expression of the βARKct, a peptide inhibitor of GRK2 activity. This study was conducted to examine the role of GRK2 and its activity during acute myocardial ischemic injury using an I/R model. METHODS AND RESULTS:We demonstrate, using cardiac-specific GRK2 and βARKct-expressing transgenic mice, a deleterious effect of GRK2 on in vivo myocardial I/R injury with βARKct imparting cardioprotection. Post-I/R infarct size was greater in GRK2-overexpressing mice (45.0±2.8% versus 31.3±2.3% in controls) and significantly smaller in βARKct mice (16.8±1.3%, P
ISSN:0009-7330
1524-4571
DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.221010