Symbolic representations in motor sequence learning
It has been shown that varying the spatial versus symbolic nature of stimulus presentation and response production, which affects stimulus–response (S–R) mapping requirements, influences the magnitude of implicit sequence learning (Koch and Hoffman, 2000). Here, we evaluated how spatial and symbolic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2011-01, Vol.54 (1), p.417-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It has been shown that varying the spatial versus symbolic nature of stimulus presentation and response production, which affects stimulus–response (S–R) mapping requirements, influences the magnitude of implicit sequence learning (Koch and Hoffman, 2000). Here, we evaluated how spatial and symbolic stimuli and responses affect the neural bases of sequence learning. We selectively eliminated the spatial component of stimulus presentation (spatial vs. symbolic), response execution (manual vs. vocal), or both. Fourteen participants performed the alternating serial reaction time task under these conditions in an MRI scanner, with interleaved acquisition to allow for recording of vocal response reaction times. Nine regions of interest (ROIs) were selected to test the hypothesis that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was preferentially engaged for spatially cued conditions and cerebellum lobule HVI, crus I and II were associated with symbolically cued learning. We found that the left cerebellum lobule HVI was selectively recruited for symbolic learning and the percent signal change in this region was correlated with learning magnitude under the symbolic conditions. In contrast, the DLPFC did not exhibit selective activation for learning under spatial conditions. The inferior parietal lobule exhibited increased activation during learning regardless of the condition, supporting its role in forming an abstract representation of learned sequences. These findings reveal different brain networks that are flexibly engaged depending on the conditions of sequence learning.
►The left cerebellum lobule VI is selectively recruited for symbolic sequence learning. ►DLPFC is not selectively activated for spatial sequence learning. ►The inferior parietal lobule encodes an abstract representation of learned sequences. ►Different brain networks are flexibly engaged during sequence learning. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.019 |