Steroid-sparing effects of pentoxifylline in pulmonary sarcoidosis

Agents that target pro-inflammatory cytokines may be useful in pulmonary sarcoidosis. To determine effectiveness of a non-selective cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor, pentoxifylline (POF). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Clinical Research Center, National Instit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases, 2009-07, Vol.26 (2), p.121-131
Hauptverfasser: Park, M K, Fontana, Jr, Babaali, H, Gilbert-McClain, L I, Stylianou, M, Joo, J, Moss, J, Manganiello, V C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Agents that target pro-inflammatory cytokines may be useful in pulmonary sarcoidosis. To determine effectiveness of a non-selective cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor, pentoxifylline (POF). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health. 27 patients with biopsy-confirmed pulmonary sarcoidosis receiving prednisone. Placebo or POF (1200-2000 mg/day) for 10 months, as prednisone was tapered. Primary endpoints: sustained improvement in two or more pulmonary function parameters, or a combination of one pulmonary function parameter and dyspnea. Except for one patient, primary endpoints were not reached in POF-treated patients. Therefore, a post hoc analysis was performed. The observed relative risk reduction for flares associated with POF treatment was 54.9% (95% CI 0.21, 0.89) and the absolute risk reduction was 50.6% (95% CI 0.22, 0.80). Compared to placebo treatment, in the POF group, the mean prednisone dose was lower at 8 and 10 months (p = 0.007 and 0.01 respectively), and there was a trend towards less prednisone usage over the entire study period (p = 0.053), as determined by cumulative change analysis. Although our exploratory post hoc analysis suggested that POF reduced flares and had steroid-sparing effects, given the study limitations, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the efficacy of POF in pulmonary sarcoidosis. In addition, gastrointestinal side-effects, at the doses used, would seem to limit the use of POF in treating pulmonary sarcoidosis. Overall, however, this trial may provide a basis for using more specific, better-tolerated, PDE inhibitors in future clinical trials.
ISSN:1124-0490