Prevalence of insulin resistance and its relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors among Thai adults over 35 years old

Abstract Aims To estimate the prevalence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and to study its relationship with selected cardiovascular disease risk factors among Thai adults. Methods This cross-sectional study was comprised of 227 men and 990 women undergoing routine health check-up. The prevalence of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes research and clinical practice 2010-09, Vol.89 (3), p.303-308
Hauptverfasser: Do, Hau D, Lohsoonthorn, Vitool, Jiamjarasrangsi, Wiroj, Lertmaharit, Somrat, Williams, Michelle A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims To estimate the prevalence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and to study its relationship with selected cardiovascular disease risk factors among Thai adults. Methods This cross-sectional study was comprised of 227 men and 990 women undergoing routine health check-up. The prevalence of insulin resistance was estimated using diagnostic criteria previously employed in Asian and other populations. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to evaluate associations of HOMA-IR with selected cardiovascular disease risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression procedures were used to evaluate associations of hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-Cholesterolemia, and hypertension with varying HOMA-IR values. Results Approximately 25.1% of men (HOMA-IR ≥ 1.56) and 21.5% of women (HOMA-IR ≥ 1.64) were classified as having insulin resistance. HOMA-IR values were statistically significantly and positively associated with body mass index, body fat percentage, waist circumference, and serum triglycerides. The values were inversely correlated with HDL-Cholesterol. When compared with those whose HOMA-IR values were within the lowest quartile (
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.04.013