Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Motivational Interviewing in Education to Structured Diabetes Education in Teens With Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To compare motivational interviewing-based education (MI) and structured diabetes education (SDE) for improving A1C and psychosocial measures in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a 9-month randomized controlled trial comparing MI (n = 21) to SDE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes care 2010-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1741-1743
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Yu-Chi, Stewart, Sunita M, Mackenzie, Marsha, Nakonezny, Paul A, Edwards, Deidre, White, Perrin C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE: To compare motivational interviewing-based education (MI) and structured diabetes education (SDE) for improving A1C and psychosocial measures in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a 9-month randomized controlled trial comparing MI (n = 21) to SDE (n = 23). Interventions were at baseline (T0) and 3 months (T1), with A1C and psychosocial measures obtained at 6 months (T2) and 9 months (T3). RESULTS: Over the 6 months of follow-up, the SDE group had lower adjusted mean A1C value (least squares mean 10.31, SE 0.32) than the MI group (least squares mean 11.35, SE 0.34) (P = 0.03, d = -0.66). There were no differences on any of the psychosocial measures. CONCLUSIONS: SDE is effective at improving metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes educators were proficient in learning MI.
ISSN:0149-5992
1935-5548
DOI:10.2337/dc10-0019