Accuracy Assessment for AG500, Electromagnetic Articulograph

Jordan R. Green Antje Mefferd University of Nebraska–Lincoln Contact author: Yana Yunusova, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Rehabilitation Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue,Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V7, Canada. E-mail: yana.yunusova{at}utoronto.ca . Purpose...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2009-04, Vol.52 (2), p.547-555
Hauptverfasser: Yunusova, Yana, Green, Jordan R, Mefferd, Antje
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Jordan R. Green Antje Mefferd University of Nebraska–Lincoln Contact author: Yana Yunusova, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Rehabilitation Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue,Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V7, Canada. E-mail: yana.yunusova{at}utoronto.ca . Purpose: The goal of this article was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the AG500 (Carstens Medizinelectronik, Lenglern, Germany), an electromagnetic device developed recently to register articulatory movements in three dimensions. This technology seems to have unprecedented capabilities to provide rich information about time-varying positions of articulators. However, strengths and weaknesses of the system need to be better understood before the device is used for speech research. Method: Evaluations of the sensor positions over time were obtained during (a) movements of the calibration device, (b) manual movements of sensors in a cartridge within the recording field of the cube, and (c) various speech tasks. Results: Results showed a median error to be under 0.5 mm across different types of recordings. The maximum error often ranged between 1 and 2 mm. The magnitude of error depended somewhat on the task but largely on the location of the sensors within the recording region of the cube. Conclusion: The performance of the system was judged as adequate for speech movement acquisition, provided that specific steps are taken for minimizing error during recording and for validating the quality of recorded data. KEY WORDS: electromagnetic articulography, AG500, speech kinematics CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?
ISSN:1092-4388
1558-9102
DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0218)