Decreased Susceptibility to Teicoplanin and Vancomycin in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Orthopedic-Device-Associated Infections

We studied 315 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus strains recovered prospectively during 240 surgical procedures (206 subjects) from proven or suspected device-associated bone and joint infections. Sixteen strains (5.1%) had decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides: 15 (12 S. epidermidis strains, 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2010-04, Vol.48 (4), p.1428-1431
Hauptverfasser: Cremniter, Julie, Slassi, Asma, Quincampoix, Jean-Charles, Sivadon-Tardy, Valérie, Bauer, Thomas, Porcher, Raphaël, Lortat-Jacob, Alain, Piriou, Philippe, Judet, Thierry, Herrmann, Jean-Louis, Gaillard, Jean-Louis, Rottman, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We studied 315 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus strains recovered prospectively during 240 surgical procedures (206 subjects) from proven or suspected device-associated bone and joint infections. Sixteen strains (5.1%) had decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides: 15 (12 S. epidermidis strains, 2 S. capitis strains, and 1 S. haemolyticus strain) to teicoplanin alone (MIC of 16 mg/liter, n = 9; MIC of 32 mg/liter, n = 6) and one (S. epidermidis) to both teicoplanin and vancomycin (MIC, 16 and 8 mg/liter, respectively). Decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin was more prevalent in "infecting" strains (i.e., strains recovered from ≥2 distinct intraoperative samples) than in "contaminants" (i.e., strains not fulfilling this criterion) (8.1% [12/149] versus 2.4% [4/166], respectively [P = 0.022]). One hundred percent (13/13) of S. epidermidis strains with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin were resistant to methicillin (versus 112/173 [64.7%] for S. epidermidis strains susceptible to teicoplanin; P = 0.021).
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.02098-09