PS2-20: Racial Disparities in A1c Change and Medication Intensification

Introduction: While it is well documented that disparities exist across racial groups of diabetes patients relative to glucose control, the underlying causative factors are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in physician orders for adjustments of glucose contro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical medicine & research 2010-03, Vol.8 (1), p.48-49
Hauptverfasser: Rush, W. A, Crain, A L., Amundson, G. H, Kerby, T. J, Murray, A. D, Margolis, K. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: While it is well documented that disparities exist across racial groups of diabetes patients relative to glucose control, the underlying causative factors are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in physician orders for adjustments of glucose control medications in diabetes patients between African Americans and Caucasians. Methods: A cohort of 434 African American and 1,471 Caucasian diabetes patients was followed for a period of 18 months from 6/1/2006 through 11/30/2007. All patients were being treated in one of 6 primary care clinics within a large mid-western medical group. First and last A1c values were collected during the study period and an A1c change score was calculated. Patients were also classified as to whether English was their primary language and whether they were on medical assistance at any time during the study period. The presence of a medication adjustment was tracked for metformin, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas (initiation or titration) and insulins (initiation only). Medication adjustment data was from the prescribing data in the medical record and thus represents physician actions. Results: There was a significant difference between African Americans and Caucasians on their initial A1c values (8.2% vs 7.3%; P
ISSN:1539-4182
1554-6179
DOI:10.3121/cmr.8.1.48-c