Peer evaluations can be problematic

Peer evaluations can be problematic

Not surprisingly, it has been our experience that faculty members are generally given relatively high marks in the peer evaluation process. Because of the resultant ceiling effect, it is difficult to use peer evaluations to differentiate teaching abilities of faculty members. * Who is qualified to c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of pharmaceutical education 2010-02, Vol.74 (1), p.16-16
Hauptverfasser: Cates, Marshall E, Monk-Tutor, Mary R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Classrooms
Education, Pharmacy - methods
Education, Pharmacy - standards
Guidelines
Humans
Letters
Peer Evaluation
Peer Review - methods
Peer Review - standards
Pharmaceutical Education
Pharmacy
Program Evaluation - methods
Program Evaluation - standards
Student Evaluation
Students
Teaching - methods
Teaching - standards
Tenure
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Not surprisingly, it has been our experience that faculty members are generally given relatively high marks in the peer evaluation process. Because of the resultant ceiling effect, it is difficult to use peer evaluations to differentiate teaching abilities of faculty members. * Who is qualified to conduct the reviews?
ISSN:0002-9459
1553-6467