COMPARISON OF DATA-COLLECTION METHODS IN A BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN WITH PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS: A REPLICATION

COMPARISON OF DATA-COLLECTION METHODS IN A BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN WITH PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS: A REPLICATION

Cummings and Carr (2009) compared two methods of data collection in a behavioral intervention program for children with pervasive developmental disorders: collecting data on all trials versus only the first trial in a session. Results showed that basing a child's progress on first‐trial data re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2009, Vol.42 (4), p.827-832
Hauptverfasser: Najdowski, Adel C, Chilingaryan, Vardui, Bergstrom, Ryan, Granpeesheh, Doreen, Balasanyan, Susie, Aguilar, Barbara, Tarbox, Jonathan, Roane, Henry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Applied Behavior Analysis
Autism
Autistic children
Behavior Change
Behavior disorders
Behavior Modification
Behavior Patterns
Behavior Therapy - methods
Behavioral psychology
Child
Child Behavior
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive - rehabilitation
Child, Preschool
Children & youth
Comparative Analysis
Data Collection
Data Collection - methods
Developmental disabilities
discrete trials
Feedback (Response)
Female
Humans
Interpersonal Competence
interspersed trials
Intervention
Maintenance
Male
massed trials
Methods
Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Psychological Patterns
Research Methodology
Resistance (Psychology)
Skill Development
Skills
Teaching Methods
Therapists
Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cummings and Carr (2009) compared two methods of data collection in a behavioral intervention program for children with pervasive developmental disorders: collecting data on all trials versus only the first trial in a session. Results showed that basing a child's progress on first‐trial data resulted in identifying mastery‐level responding slightly sooner, whereas determining mastery based on all trials resulted in slightly better skill maintenance. In the current replication, no such differences in indication of mastery or maintenance were observed when data were collected on all trials or the first trial.
ISSN:0021-8855
1938-3703
DOI:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-827