A comparison of two depressive symptomatology measures in residential substance abuse treatment clients

Abstract Comorbid depression is common among substance abusers, making routine assessment of depression critical for high-quality care. We evaluated two of the most commonly used depressive symptomatology measures in a sample of clients ( N = 240) in residential substance abuse treatment settings. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of substance abuse treatment 2009-10, Vol.37 (3), p.318-325
Hauptverfasser: Hepner, Kimberly A., Ph.D, Hunter, Sarah B., Ph.D, Edelen, Maria O., Ph.D, Zhou, Annie J., M.S, Watkins, Katherine, M.D., M.S.H.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Comorbid depression is common among substance abusers, making routine assessment of depression critical for high-quality care. We evaluated two of the most commonly used depressive symptomatology measures in a sample of clients ( N = 240) in residential substance abuse treatment settings. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) has previously been used in clients receiving substance abuse treatment. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), originally developed for primary care settings, has not been used as frequently in substance abuse treatment settings, and it is unknown how it performs in this population. The measures were highly correlated with each other ( r = .76) and demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (BDI-II = 0.91, PHQ-9 = 0.87); however, the PHQ-9 classifies more individuals as having “mild” depression symptoms relative to the BDI-II, which tends to suggest these individuals have no depression symptoms. Implications for assessing depression symptoms in individuals receiving substance abuse treatment are discussed.
ISSN:0740-5472
1873-6483
DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.03.005