Population Pharmacodynamic Parameter Estimation from Sparse Sampling: Effect of Sigmoidicity on Parameter Estimates
The objective of this stimulation study was to evaluate effect of simoidicity of the concentration–effect ( C – E ) relationship on the efficiency of population parameter estimation from sparse sampling and is a continuation of previous work that addressed the effect of sample size and number of sam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The AAPS journal 2009-09, Vol.11 (3), p.535-540, Article 535 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The objective of this stimulation study was to evaluate effect of simoidicity of the concentration–effect (
C
–
E
) relationship on the efficiency of population parameter estimation from sparse sampling and is a continuation of previous work that addressed the effect of sample size and number of samples on parameters estimation from sparse sampling for drugs with
C
–
E
relationship characterized by high sigmoidicity (
γ
> 5). The findings are based on observed
C
–
E
relationships for two drugs, octreotide and remifentanil, characterized by simple
E
max
and sigmoid
E
max
models (
γ
= ~2.5), respectively. For each model,
C
–
E
profiles (100 replicates of 100 subjects each) were simulated for several sampling designs, with four or five samples/individual randomly obtained from within sampling windows based on EC
50
-normalized plasma drug concentrations, PD parameters based on observed population mean values, and inter-individual and residual variability of 30% and 25%, respectively. The
C
–
E
profiles were fitted using non-linear mixed effect modeling with the first-order conditional estimation method; variability parameters were described by an exponential error model. The results showed that, for the sigmoid
E
max
model, designs with four or five samples reliably estimated the PD parameters (EC
50
,
E
max
,
E
0
, and
γ
), whereas the five-sample design, with two samples in the 2–3
E
max
region, provided in addition more reliable estimates of inter-individual variability; increasing the information content of the EC
50
region was not critical as long as this region was covered by a single sample in the 0.5–1.5 EC
50
window. For the simple
E
max
model, because of the shallower profile, enriching the EC
50
region was more important. The impact of enrichment of appropriate regions for the two models can be explained based on the shape (sigmoidicity) of the concentration–effect relationships, with shallower
C
–
E
profiles requiring data enrichment in the EC
50
region and steeper curves less so; in both cases, the
E
max
region needs to be adequately delineated, however. The results provide a general framework for population parameter estimation from sparse sampling in clinical trials when the underlying
C
–
E
profiles have different degrees of sigmoidicity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1550-7416 1550-7416 |
DOI: | 10.1208/s12248-009-9131-2 |