Critical thinking ability of new graduate and experienced nurses

Title.  Critical thinking ability of new graduate and experienced nurses. Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to identify critical thinking learning needs of new and experienced nurses. Background.  Concern for patient safety has grown worldwide as high rates of error and injury continue to be r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced nursing 2009-01, Vol.65 (1), p.139-148
Hauptverfasser: Fero, Laura J., Witsberger, Catherine M., Wesmiller, Susan W., Zullo, Thomas G., Hoffman, Leslie A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Title.  Critical thinking ability of new graduate and experienced nurses. Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to identify critical thinking learning needs of new and experienced nurses. Background.  Concern for patient safety has grown worldwide as high rates of error and injury continue to be reported. In order to improve patient safety, nurses must be able to recognize changes in patient condition, perform independent nursing interventions, anticipate orders and prioritize. Methods.  In 2004–2006, a consecutive sample of 2144 newly hired nurses in a university‐affiliated healthcare system completed the Performance Based Development System Assessment consisting of 10 videotaped vignettes depicting change in patient status. Results were reported as meeting or not meeting expectations. For nurses not meeting expectations, learning needs were identified in one of six subcategories. Results.  Overall, 74·9% met assessment expectations. Learning needs identified for nurses not meeting expectations included initiating independent nursing interventions (97·2%), differentiation of urgency (67%), reporting essential clinical data (65·4%), anticipating relevant medical orders (62·8%), providing relevant rationale to support decisions (62·6%) and problem recognition (57·1%). Controlling for level of preparation, associate (P = 0·007) and baccalaureate (P 
ISSN:0309-2402
1365-2648
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04834.x