Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Background: We address the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS , PIK3CA and BRAF mutations for clinical outcomes in response to active agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: We determined KRAS , BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in tumours from 168 patients treated for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of cancer 2009-08, Vol.101 (3), p.465-472 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
We address the prognostic and predictive value of
KRAS
,
PIK3CA
and
BRAF
mutations for clinical outcomes in response to active agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods:
We determined
KRAS
,
BRAF
and
PIK3CA
mutations in tumours from 168 patients treated for mCRC at two institutions. All patients received 5-FU-based first-line chemotherapy and treatment outcome was analysed retrospectively.
Results:
KRAS
,
BRAF
and
PIK3CA
mutations were present in 62 (37%), 13 (8%) and 26 (15%) cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis uncovered
BRAF
mutation as an independent prognostic factor for decreased survival (hazard ratio (HR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–7.6). In addition, patients with
BRAF
-mutant tumours had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS: HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.2–7.4) than those whose tumors that carried wild-type
BRAF
. Among 92 patients treated using chemotherapy and cetuximab as salvage therapy,
KRAS
mutation was associated with lack of response (
P
=0.002) and shorter PFS (
P
=0.09).
BRAF
(
P
=0.0005) and
PIK3CA
(
P
=0.01) mutations also predicted reduced PFS in response to cetuximab salvage therapy.
Conclusions:
These results underscore the potential of mutational profiling to identify CRCs with different natural histories or treatment responses. The adverse significance of
BRAF
mutation should inform patient selection and stratification in clinical trials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605164 |