Hypertension treatment and control rates Chart review in an academic family medicine clinic

To characterize hypertension management in an academic family medicine clinic. Cross-sectional chart review. Academic family medicine clinic in Edmonton, Alta. A total of 210 patients with 1 or more visits for hypertension during the previous 3 years. Patient characteristics, current antihypertensiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian family physician 2009-07, Vol.55 (7), p.735-741
Hauptverfasser: Houlihan, Sara J, Simpson, Scot H, Cave, Andrew J, Flook, Nigel W, Hurlburt, Mary E, Lord, Chris J, Smith, Linda L, Sternberg, Harvey H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To characterize hypertension management in an academic family medicine clinic. Cross-sectional chart review. Academic family medicine clinic in Edmonton, Alta. A total of 210 patients with 1 or more visits for hypertension during the previous 3 years. Patient characteristics, current antihypertensive therapies, most recent blood pressure measurements, and compelling indications according to the 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations. A total of 185 subjects (88%) were prescribed antihypertensive medications, and 89 (42%) had controlled hypertension. Younger subjects, people with diabetes, and people not receiving antihypertensive medication therapy appeared less likely to have controlled hypertension. There were 76 subjects (36%) prescribed 1 antihypertensive medication, 65 subjects (31%) prescribed 2 antihypertensive medications, and 44 (21%) prescribed 3 or more antihypertensive medications. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed for 51% of the subjects, diuretics for 47%, beta-blockers for 27%, calcium channel blockers for 23%, angiotensin receptor blockers for 20%, and alpha-blockers for 1%. Hypertension treatment and control rates in this academic family medicine clinic appear to be better than those in the general population. Following the principles of a continuous quality improvement process, this information will serve as an important foundation for identifying areas to improve hypertension management in the clinic.
ISSN:0008-350X
1715-5258