Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of non-fixed and fixed combinations of artesunate and amodiaquine in Malaysian healthy normal volunteers

Objective There is limited pharmacokinetic data available for the combination artesunate + amodiaquine, which is used widely to treat uncomplicated malaria. This study examines the bioavailability and tolerability of a fixed (200 mg artesunate + 540 mg amodiaquine) and loose (200 mg + 612 mg) combin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical pharmacology 2009-08, Vol.65 (8), p.809-821
Hauptverfasser: Navaratnam, Visweswaran, Ramanathan, Surash, Wahab, Mohd Suhaimi Ab, Siew Hua, Gan, Mansor, Sharif Mahsufi, Kiechel, Jean-René, Vaillant, Michel, Taylor, Walter R. J, Olliaro, Piero
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective There is limited pharmacokinetic data available for the combination artesunate + amodiaquine, which is used widely to treat uncomplicated malaria. This study examines the bioavailability and tolerability of a fixed (200 mg artesunate + 540 mg amodiaquine) and loose (200 mg + 612 mg) combination with a 2x2 cross-over design in 24 healthy volunteers. Methods Parent compounds and metabolites [dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ)] were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection, and the area under the curve (AUC)₀₋t and Cmax were compared by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on geometric least square means using the Schuirmann two one-sided test. Results The AUC₀₋t for total DHA and DEAQ were 1522 ± 633 and 30021 ± 14211 ng h/ml for the fixed products and 1688 ± 767 and 40261 ± 19824 ng h/ml (mean ± standard deviation) for the loose products. The ANOVA showed no statistical differences except for sequence effect for DHA. The values obtained with the fixed product were within the 125% bioequivalent limits but extend below the 80% bioequivalence limits. Conclusion Both combinations were well tolerated and had comparable pharmacokinetic profiles; differences are unlikely to be clinically relevant.
ISSN:0031-6970
1432-1041
DOI:10.1007/s00228-009-0656-1