International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes
5% are likely at the highest risk for progression to diabetes, but this range should not be considered an absolute threshold at which preventative measures are initiated. * The classification of subdiabetic hyperglycemia as pre-diabetes is problematic because it suggests that all individuals so clas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2009-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1327-1334 |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 5% are likely at the highest risk for progression to diabetes, but this range should not be considered an absolute threshold at which preventative measures are initiated. * The classification of subdiabetic hyperglycemia as pre-diabetes is problematic because it suggests that all individuals so classified will develop diabetes and that individuals who do not meet these glycemia-driven criteria (regardless of other risk factor values) are unlikely to develop diabetes - neither of which is the case. [...] the categorical classification of individuals as high risk (e.g., IFG or IGT) or low risk, based on any measure of glycemia, is less than ideal because the risk for progression to diabetes appears to be a continuum. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/dc09-9033 |