Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection: Appraisal of the state-of-the-science

Abstract Objective We wanted to identify the most promising methylation marker candidates for cervical cancer early detection. Methods A systematic literature review was performed in Medline and weighted average frequencies for methylated genes stratified by tissue source and methods used were compu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2009-02, Vol.112 (2), p.293-299
Hauptverfasser: Wentzensen, Nicolas, Sherman, Mark E, Schiffman, Mark, Wang, Sophia S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective We wanted to identify the most promising methylation marker candidates for cervical cancer early detection. Methods A systematic literature review was performed in Medline and weighted average frequencies for methylated genes stratified by tissue source and methods used were computed. Results 51 studies were identified analyzing 68 different genes for methylation in 4376 specimens across all stages of cervical carcinogenesis. 15 genes, DAPK1, RASSF1, CDH1, CDKN2A, MGMT, RARB, APC, FHIT, MLH1, TIMP3, GSTP1, CADM1, CDH13, HIC1, and TERT have been analyzed in 5 or more studies. The published data on these genes is highly heterogeneous; 7 genes (CDH1, FHIT, TERT, CDH13, MGMT, TIMP3, and HIC1) had a reported range of methylation frequencies in cervical cancers of greater than 60% between studies. Stratification by analysis method did not resolve the heterogeneity. Three markers, DAPK1, CADM1, and RARB, showed elevated methylation in cervical cancers consistently across studies. Conclusions There is currently no methylation marker that can be readily translated for use in cervical cancer screening or triage settings. Large, well-conducted methylation profiling studies of cervical carcinogenesis could yield new candidates that are more specific for HPV-related carcinogenesis. New candidate markers need to be thoroughly validated in highly standardized assays.
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.012