Dipolar Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Chromophores Containing Ferrocene, Octamethylferrocene, and Ruthenocene Donors and Strong π-Acceptors: Crystal Structures and Comparison of π-Donor Strengths

Crystal structures have been determined for six dipolar polyene chromophores with metallocenylferrocenyl (Fc), octamethylferrocenyl (Fc′′), or ruthenocenyl (Rc)donors and strong heterocyclic acceptors based on 1,3-diethyl-2-thiobarbituric acid or 3-dicyanomethylidene-2,3-dihydrobenzothiophene-1,1-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organometallics 2009-03, Vol.28 (5), p.1350-1357
Hauptverfasser: Kinnibrugh, Tiffany L, Salman, Seyhan, Getmanenko, Yulia A, Coropceanu, Veaceslav, Porter, William W, Timofeeva, Tatiana V, Matzger, Adam J, Brédas, Jean-Luc, Marder, Seth R, Barlow, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Crystal structures have been determined for six dipolar polyene chromophores with metallocenylferrocenyl (Fc), octamethylferrocenyl (Fc′′), or ruthenocenyl (Rc)donors and strong heterocyclic acceptors based on 1,3-diethyl-2-thiobarbituric acid or 3-dicyanomethylidene-2,3-dihydrobenzothiophene-1,1-dioxide. In each case, crystals were found to belong to centrosymmetric space groups. For one example, polymer-induced heteronucleation revealed the existence of two additional forms, which were inactive in second-harmonic generation, suggesting that they were also centrosymmetric. The bond-length alternations between the formally double and single bonds of the polyene bridges are reduced compared to simple polyenes, indicating significant contribution from charge-separated resonance structures, although the metallocenes are not significantly distorted toward the [(η6-fulvene)(η5-cyclopentadienyl)metal(II)]+ extreme. DFT geometries are in excellent agreement with those determined crystallographically; while the π-donor strengths of the three metallocenyl groups are insufficiently different to result in detectable differences in the crystallographic bond-length alternations, the DFT geometries, as well as DFT calculations of partial charges for atoms, suggest that π-donor strength decreases in the order Fc′′ ≫ Fc > Rc. NMR, IR, and electrochemical evidence also suggests that octamethylferrocenyl is the stronger π-donor, exhibiting similar π-donor strength to a p-(dialkylamino)phenyl group, while ferrocenyl and ruthenocenyl show very similar π-donor strengths to one another in chromophores of this type.
ISSN:0276-7333
1520-6041
DOI:10.1021/om800986s