An experimental and theoretical evaluation of the influence of pretargeting antibody on the tumor accumulation of effector
In treating tumors by pretargeting, the antitumor antibody and the cytotoxic effector (e.g., toxins and radioactivity) are separately administered. Therefore, pretargeting is more complicated with many variables. We are conducting studies to understand the influence of each variable using a novel re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular cancer therapeutics 2008-05, Vol.7 (5), p.1025-1032 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In treating tumors by pretargeting, the antitumor antibody and the cytotoxic effector (e.g., toxins and radioactivity) are
separately administered. Therefore, pretargeting is more complicated with many variables. We are conducting studies to understand
the influence of each variable using a novel recognition pair of mutually complementary phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers
(MORF/cMORF). Earlier we developed a semi-empirical model capable of accurately predicting the behavior of a radiolabeled
cMORF effector with variations in dosages and timing. We have now extended the model to predict the effector behavior, in
particular, its maximum percent tumor accumulation (MPTA) in mice pretargeted with three different MORF-conjugated antibodies
(MN14, B72.3, and CC49). The MN14 and the CC49 target different antigens in the same tumor, whereas the CC49 and the B72.3
target the same antigen but with very different tumor accumulation. By comparing the pretargeting results of these three antibodies
with our prediction, we confirmed that the MPTA of the radiolabeled cMORF effector in the LS174T tumor is independent of the
antibodies. In conclusion, the MPTA cannot be improved through the use of different pretargeting antibodies, although different
antibodies may improve the maximum absolute tumor accumulation, the heterogeneity, and/or the tumor-to-normal tissue ratios
of the effector. This conclusion will apply equally well to effectors carrying a fluorescent probe, an anticancer agent, or
a radioactive imaging agent. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(5):1025–32] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1535-7163 1538-8514 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2203 |