The “4-hour target”: emergency nurses’ views

Objective: To explore nurses’ views and to identify the perceived advantages and disadvantages of the “4-hour target” Methods: The study was based in one emergency department (ED) in the UK and took a generic qualitative approach. A stratified sample of nine experienced ED nurses were recruited for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2007-06, Vol.24 (6), p.402-404
Hauptverfasser: Mortimore, Andy, Cooper, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To explore nurses’ views and to identify the perceived advantages and disadvantages of the “4-hour target” Methods: The study was based in one emergency department (ED) in the UK and took a generic qualitative approach. A stratified sample of nine experienced ED nurses were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using the framework analysis1,2 approach. Results: The 4-hour target was considered an overall success in reducing waiting times and increasing patient satisfaction. However, staff expressed concerns over the imposed nature of the target, workload pressures, quality of care, and the level of support from secondary and primary care. Conclusion: Although deemed an overall success, there were reservations as to the target’s sustainability. Recommendations are made for improved communication between primary and secondary care and establishing the target as a shared goal within the hospital environment.
ISSN:1472-0205
1472-0213
DOI:10.1136/emj.2006.044933