Crossing the Research Valleys of Death: The University of Pittsburgh Approach

Bridging the valley of death” is a phrase that has been used in nonhealth‐related disciplines to describe the fundamental challenge of applying research and development advances to operations. 1 However, the “valley of death” metaphor is equally appropriate to describe the two major gaps in the translational research continuum: (1) the translation of laboratory discoveries to human subjects and (2) the translation of the resulting evidence to clinical and public health practice and policy. 2,3 As one of the initial 12 academic health centers to receive a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2006, the University of Pittsburgh is part of a growing national consortium (24 institutions in 18 states as of September 2007) on the forefront of developing and evaluating new research models as a means of bridging these valleys. 4 Strategies employed by industry to meet the “valley of death” challenge include the development of interdisciplinary research programs, infrastructure, interfaces with user communities, observation and data access partnerships, and continuous evaluation processes. 1 In addition to adopting these strategies, the biomedical research community must develop strategies to overcome other barriers in order to more effectively translate research findings into healthcare practice. 5 Among these barriers are the complex organizational structures of traditional academic health centers, cultures that do not foster collaboration, a shortage of translational investigators to bridge the two major gaps, the absence of mechanisms to facilitate transdisciplinary research, inadequate financial support, and regulatory impediments to clinical research. With $83.5 million in CTSA funding over a 5‐year period, the University of Pittsburgh has established a Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) to serve the dual purposes of: (1) integrating existing programs with innovative new clinical and translational science initiatives under a common umbrella and (2) creating an awareness and understanding—initially among members of the biomedical research/healthcare community but eventually among the general public as well—of the tangible benefits to health practice that can be realized from clinical and translational research. Other goals include (1) fostering a multidisciplinary, team‐based approach to research (such as through an online resource for linking investigators and clinicians from throughou