Proteomic identification of non-Gal antibody targets after pig-to-primate cardiac xenotransplantation

:  Background:  Experience with non‐antigenic galactose α1,3 galactose (αGal) polymers and development of αGal deficient pigs has reduced or eliminated the significance of this antigen in xenograft rejection. Despite these advances, delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) continues to occur most likely du...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Xenotransplantation (Københaven) 2008-07, Vol.15 (4), p.268-276
Hauptverfasser: Byrne, Guerard W., Stalboerger, Paul G., Davila, Eduardo, Heppelmann, Carrie J., Gazi, Mozammel H., McGregor, Hugh C. J., LaBreche, Peter T., Davies, William R., Rao, Vinay P., Oi, Keiji, Tazelaar, Henry D., Logan, John S., McGregor, Christopher G. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung::  Background:  Experience with non‐antigenic galactose α1,3 galactose (αGal) polymers and development of αGal deficient pigs has reduced or eliminated the significance of this antigen in xenograft rejection. Despite these advances, delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) continues to occur most likely due to antibody responses to non‐Gal endothelial cell (EC) antigens. Methods:  To gauge the diversity of the non‐Gal antibody response we used antibody derived from CD46 transgenic heterotopic cardiac xenografts performed without T‐cell immunosuppression, Group A (n = 4) and Gal knockout (GT‐KO) heart transplants under tacrolimus and sirolimus immunosuppression, Group B (n = 8). Non‐Gal antibody was measured by flow cytometry and by western blots using GT‐KO EC membrane antigens. A nanoLC/MS/MS analysis of proteins recovered from 2D gels was used to identify target antigens. Results:  Group A recipients exhibited a mixed cellular and humoral rejection. Group B recipients mainly exhibited classical DXR. Western blot analysis showed a non‐Gal antibody response induced by GT+ and GT‐KO hearts to an overlapping set of pig aortic EC membrane antigens. Proteomic analysis identified 14 potential target antigens but failed to define several immunodominant targets. Conclusions:  These experiments indicate that the non‐Gal antibody response is directed to a number of stress response and inflammation related pig EC antigens and a few undefined targets. Further analysis of these antibody specificities using alternative methods is required to more fully define the repertoire of non‐Gal antibody responses.
ISSN:0908-665X
1399-3089
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3089.2008.00480.x