Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users
Forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves (fmSTCs) were measured in twelve cochlear-implant subjects, six using bipolar stimulation (Nucleus devices) and six using monopolar stimulation (Clarion devices). fmSTCs were measured at several probe levels on a middle electrode using a fixed-leve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008-03, Vol.123 (3), p.1522-1543 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves (fmSTCs) were measured in twelve cochlear-implant subjects, six using bipolar stimulation (Nucleus devices) and six using monopolar stimulation (Clarion devices). fmSTCs were measured at several probe levels on a middle electrode using a fixed-level probe stimulus and variable-level maskers. The average fmSTC slopes obtained in subjects using bipolar stimulation
(
3.7
dB
∕
mm
)
were approximately three times steeper than average slopes obtained in subjects using monopolar stimulation
(
1.2
dB
∕
mm
)
. Average spatial bandwidths were about half as wide for subjects with bipolar stimulation
(
2.6
mm
)
than for subjects with monopolar stimulation
(
4.6
mm
)
. None of the tuning curve characteristics changed significantly with probe level. fmSTCs replotted in terms of acoustic frequency, using
Greenwood's
[
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
,
1344-1356
(
1961
)
] frequency-to-place equation, were compared with forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves obtained previously from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners. The average tuning characteristics of fmSTCs in electric hearing were similar to the broad tuning observed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners at high stimulus levels. This suggests that spatial tuning is not the primary factor limiting speech perception in many cochlear implant users. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
DOI: | 10.1121/1.2836786 |