Comparison of self‐administered vaginal misoprostol versus placebo for cervical ripening prior to operative hysteroscopy using a sequential trial design

Objective  To compare the impact of 1000 micrograms of self‐administered vaginal misoprostol versus self‐administered vaginal placebo at home on preoperative cervical ripening in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women before operative hysteroscopy. Design  Two separate but identical parallel, r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2008-04, Vol.115 (5), p.663-e9
Hauptverfasser: Oppegaard, KS, Nesheim, B‐I, Istre, O, Qvigstad, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective  To compare the impact of 1000 micrograms of self‐administered vaginal misoprostol versus self‐administered vaginal placebo at home on preoperative cervical ripening in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women before operative hysteroscopy. Design  Two separate but identical parallel, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled sequential trials, one in premenopausal women and one in postmenopausal women. The boundaries for the sequential trials were calculated on the primary outcomes of a difference of cervical dilatation ≥1 mm, with the assumption of a type 1 error of 0.05 and a power of 0.95. Setting  Norwegian university teaching hospital. Sample  Eighty‐six women referred to outpatient operative hysteroscopy. Methods  The women were randomised to either 1000 micrograms of self‐administered vaginal misoprostol or self‐administered vaginal placebo the evening before outpatient operative hysteroscopy. Main outcome measures  Preoperative cervical dilatation (primary outcome), number of women who achieve a preoperative cervical dilatation ≥5 mm, acceptability, complications and adverse effects (secondary outcomes). Results  In premenopausal women, the mean cervical dilatation was 6.4 mm (SD 2.4) in the misoprostol group and 4.8 mm (SD 2.0) in the placebo group, the mean difference in cervical dilatation being 1.6 mm (95% CI 0.5–2.7). Among the premenopausal women receiving misoprostol, 88% achieved a cervical dilatation of ≥5 mm compared with 65% in the placebo group. Twelve percent of the women who received misoprostol were difficult to dilate compared with 32% who received placebo. Dilatation was also quicker in the misoprostol group. Misoprostol had no effect on cervical ripening in postmenopausal women compared with placebo, and 43% of the women were difficult to dilate. The trials were terminated after analysis of 21 postmenopausal women and 65 premenopausal women after reaching a conclusion on the primary outcome with only 28% of the number of women needed in a fixed sample size trial. Three of 45 women who received misoprostol experienced severe lower abdominal pain, and there was an increased occurrence of light preoperative bleeding in the misoprostol group. Most women did not experience misoprostol‐related adverse effects. The majority (83% of premenopausal and 76% of postmenopausal women) found self‐administered vaginal misoprostol at home to be acceptable. There were two serious complications in the premenopausal misoprostol group
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01628.x