Bilateral Medial Tibiofemoral Joint Stiffness in Full Extension and 20° of Knee Flexion

The valgus stress test is used clinically to assess injury to the medial knee structures in 2 positions: full extension and some degree of flexion. The amount of flexion used to "isolate" the medial collateral ligament is not consistent in the literature, but most studies have shown that s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of athletic training 2008-03, Vol.43 (2), p.157-163
Hauptverfasser: Aronson, Patricia A., Rijke, Arie M., Ingersoll, Christopher D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The valgus stress test is used clinically to assess injury to the medial knee structures in 2 positions: full extension and some degree of flexion. The amount of flexion used to "isolate" the medial collateral ligament is not consistent in the literature, but most studies have shown that stiffness of the ligaments was consistent between the limbs. To determine (1) if the stiffness of the medial knee structures was the same bilaterally, and (2) if the stiffness was different in full extension compared with 20° of knee flexion. Criterion standard, before-after design. University research laboratory. Both knees of 45 healthy and active volunteers (26 females, 19 males; age = 23.2 ± 3.96 years, height = 170.6 ± 7.75 cm, mass = 74.2 ± 15.14 kg) were studied. A valgus force of 60 N was applied to the lateral aspect of both knees in full extension and in 20° of flexion. The slope of the force-strain line of the medial knee during a valgus force was calculated using the LigMaster arthrometer. Slope means in full extension were 16.1 ± 3.3 (right knee) and 15.8 ± 3.1 (left knee). Means for 20° of flexion were 12.2 ± 3.1 (right) and 11.7 ± 2.8 (left). Stiffness was greater when the knee was in full extension versus 20° of flexion (t^sub 44^ = 12.04, P < .001). No difference was noted between the slopes of the 2 knees in extension (t^sub 44^ = 0.74, P = .46) or in flexion (t^sub 44^ = 1.2, P = .27). These findings support the use of the contralateral knee as a control. Further, the valgus stress test should be performed in full extension and in some degree of flexion to assess the different restraining structures of the medial tibiofemoral joint.
ISSN:1062-6050
1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.157