Oxygen-uptake efficiency slope as a determinant of fitness in overweight adolescents

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is frequently difficult to assess in overweight individuals; therefore, submaximal measures that predict VO2peak are proposed as substitutes. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) has been suggested as a submaximal measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness that is indepen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2007-10, Vol.39 (10), p.1811-1816
Hauptverfasser: DRINKARD, Bart, ROBERTS, Mary D, RANZENHOFER, Lisa M, HAN, Joan C, YANOFF, Lisa B, MERKE, Deborah P, SAVASTANO, David M, BRADY, Sheila, YANOVSKI, Jack A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is frequently difficult to assess in overweight individuals; therefore, submaximal measures that predict VO2peak are proposed as substitutes. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) has been suggested as a submaximal measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness that is independent of exercise intensity. There are few data examining its value as a predictor of V O2peak in severely overweight adolescents. One hundred seven severely overweight (BMI Z 2.50 +/- 0.34) and 43 nonoverweight (BMI Z 0.13 +/- 0.84) adolescents, performed a maximal cycle ergometer test with respiratory gas-exchange measurements. OUES was calculated through three exercise intensities: lactate inflection point (OUES LI), 150% of lactate inflection point (OUES 150), and VO2peak (OUES PEAK). When adjusted for lean body mass, VO2peak and OUES at all exercise intensities were lower in overweight subjects (VO2peak: 35.3 +/- 6.4 vs 46.8 +/- 7.9 mL.kg(-1) LBM.min(-1), P < 0.001; OUES LI: 37.9 +/- 10.0 vs 43.7 +/- 9.2 mL.kg(-1) LBM.min(-1).logL(-1) P < 0.001; OUES 150: 41.6 +/- 9.0 vs 49.8 +/- 11.1 mL.kg(-1) LBM.min(-1).logL(-1) P < 0.001; and OUES PEAK: 45.1 +/- 8.7 vs 52.8 +/- 9.6 mL.kg(-1) LBM.min(-1).logL(-1) P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in OUES with increasing exercise intensity in both groups (P < 0.001). OUES at all exercise intensities was a significant predictor of VO2peak for both groups (r2 = 0.35-0.83, P < 0.0001). However, limits of agreement for predicted VO2peak relative to actual VO2peak were wide (+/- 478 to +/- 670 mL.min(-1)). OUES differs significantly in overweight and nonoverweight adolescents. The wide interindividual variation and the exercise intensity dependence of OUES preclude its use in clinical practice as a predictor of VO2peak.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/mss.0b013e31812e52b3