Assessment tools for identifying functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability

Assessment tools should identify functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability (FAI) by discriminating unstable from stable ankles. To identify assessment tools that discriminated FAI from stable ankles and determine the most accurate assessment tool for discriminating between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of athletic training 2008-01, Vol.43 (1), p.44-50
Hauptverfasser: Ross, Scott E, Guskiewicz, Kevin M, Gross, Michael T, Yu, Bing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Assessment tools should identify functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability (FAI) by discriminating unstable from stable ankles. To identify assessment tools that discriminated FAI from stable ankles and determine the most accurate assessment tool for discriminating between FAI and stable ankles. Case-control study. Research laboratory. Fifteen individuals with FAI and 15 healthy individuals; participants with unilateral FAI reported "giving-way" sensations and ankle sprains, whereas healthy participants did not. Participants answered 12 questions on the Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT). They also performed a single-leg jump landing, which required them to jump to half their maximum jump height, land on a single leg, and stabilize quickly on a force plate. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined cutoff scores for discriminating between ankle groups for AJFAT total score and resultant vector (RV) time to stabilization. Accuracy values for discriminating between groups were determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. The cutoff score for discriminating between FAI and stable ankles was > or =26 (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 1) and > or =1.58 seconds (sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.73) for the AJFAT total score and RV time to stabilization, respectively. The area under the curve for the AJFAT was 1.0 (asymptotic significance
ISSN:1062-6050
1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.44