Assessment tools for identifying functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability
Assessment tools should identify functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability (FAI) by discriminating unstable from stable ankles. To identify assessment tools that discriminated FAI from stable ankles and determine the most accurate assessment tool for discriminating between...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of athletic training 2008-01, Vol.43 (1), p.44-50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Assessment tools should identify functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability (FAI) by discriminating unstable from stable ankles.
To identify assessment tools that discriminated FAI from stable ankles and determine the most accurate assessment tool for discriminating between FAI and stable ankles.
Case-control study.
Research laboratory.
Fifteen individuals with FAI and 15 healthy individuals; participants with unilateral FAI reported "giving-way" sensations and ankle sprains, whereas healthy participants did not.
Participants answered 12 questions on the Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT). They also performed a single-leg jump landing, which required them to jump to half their maximum jump height, land on a single leg, and stabilize quickly on a force plate.
Receiver operating characteristic curves determined cutoff scores for discriminating between ankle groups for AJFAT total score and resultant vector (RV) time to stabilization. Accuracy values for discriminating between groups were determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
The cutoff score for discriminating between FAI and stable ankles was > or =26 (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 1) and > or =1.58 seconds (sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.73) for the AJFAT total score and RV time to stabilization, respectively. The area under the curve for the AJFAT was 1.0 (asymptotic significance |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1062-6050 1938-162X |
DOI: | 10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.44 |