Patterns of ambulatory activity in subjects with and without intermittent claudication

Purpose This study compared the patterns of ambulatory activity in subjects with and without intermittent claudication. Methods The study participants were 98 subjects limited by intermittent claudication and 129 controls who were matched for age, gender, and race. Subjects were assessed on their am...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2007-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1208-1214
Hauptverfasser: Gardner, Andrew W., PhD, Montgomery, Polly S., MS, Scott, Kristy J., BS, Afaq, Azhar, MD, Blevins, Steve M., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study compared the patterns of ambulatory activity in subjects with and without intermittent claudication. Methods The study participants were 98 subjects limited by intermittent claudication and 129 controls who were matched for age, gender, and race. Subjects were assessed on their ambulatory activity patterns for 1 week with a small, lightweight step activity monitor attached to the ankle using elastic Velcro (Velcro Industries BV, Manchester, NH) straps above the lateral malleolus of the right leg. The step activity monitor recorded the number of strides taken on a minute-to-minute basis, the time spent ambulating, and the time and number of strides measured at low (30 strides/min) cadences. Results Subjects with intermittent claudication took fewer total strides each day than the controls (3149 ± 1557 strides/d vs 4230 ± 1708 strides/d; P < .001) and fewer strides at medium (1228 ± 660 strides/day vs 1638 ± 724 strides/day; P = .001) and high (766 ± 753 strides/day vs 1285 ± 1029 strides/day; P < .001) cadences. Subjects with intermittent claudication also had a lower daily average cadence than the controls (11.8 ± 2.9 strides/min vs 13.5 ± 3.1 strides/min; P < .001) and spent less total time ambulating each day (264 ± 109 min/day vs 312 ± 96 min/day; P = .034), primarily at medium (58 ± 30 min/day vs 75 ± 32 min/day; P < .001) and at high (19 ± 17 min/day vs 30 ± 22 min/day; P = .001) cadences. Conclusion Intermittent claudication is associated with lower total daily ambulatory activity owing both to less time ambulating and to fewer strides taken while ambulating, particularly at moderate and high cadences.
ISSN:0741-5214
1097-6809
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.038