A Psychometric Evaluation of the CDRS and MADRS in Assessing Depressive Symptoms in Children

ABSTRACT Objective: This study compared the psychometric properties of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in children with major depressive disorder. Method: Children ( N = 96; ages 8 to 11 years inclusive) with nonp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2007-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1204-1212
Hauptverfasser: JAIN, SHAILESH, M.D., M.P.H, CARMODY, THOMAS J., Ph.D, TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H., M.D, HUGHES, CARROLL, Ph.D, BERNSTEIN, IRA H., Ph.D, MORRIS, DAVID W., Ph.D, EMSLIE, GRAHAM J., M.D, RUSH, A. JOHN, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Objective: This study compared the psychometric properties of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in children with major depressive disorder. Method: Children ( N = 96; ages 8 to 11 years inclusive) with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder were enrolled. Participants were part of a multisite, outpatient, randomized, placebo-controlled, 9-week trial of fluoxetine (10 mg/day for the first week and 20 mg/day thereafter). The CDRS-R and MADRS were completed based on clinician interviews with both parents and children. Classic test theory and item response theory analyses were conducted. Results: The MADRS and CDRS-R total scores were correlated at baseline ( r = 0.51) and at study exit ( r = 0.85). Cronbach's α was .86 (CDRS-R) and .82 (MADRS) at exit. The effect sizes for change from baseline to exit between the fluoxetine and placebo groups were 0.78 (CDRS-R) and 0.61 (MADRS). There was agreement between the CDRS-R and MADRS in the declaration of treatment response (50% improvement from baseline to exit) in 84.2% of children. Test information function favored the CDRS-R. Conclusions: The CDRS-R showed greater effect size for differentiating drug and placebo and better test information than the MADRS in this study of depressed children.
ISSN:0890-8567
1527-5418
DOI:10.1097/chi.0b013e3180cc2575