Population pharmacokinetics of melphalan in paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients
What is already known about this subject • In one of the largest studies in children to date, we have already published a paper that has described the pharmacokinetics of melphalan using a two‐stage approach. What this study adds • The current paper is a follow‐up study in which a population pharmac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of clinical pharmacology 2007-08, Vol.64 (2), p.151-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | What is already known about this subject
• In one of the largest studies in children to date, we have already published a paper that has described the pharmacokinetics of melphalan using a two‐stage approach.
What this study adds
• The current paper is a follow‐up study in which a population pharmacokinetic model for melphalan is developed and validated in children.
• There have been no other population pharmacokinetic analyses published on melphalan given as a short infusion.
• Additionally, a nomogram is produced to guide melphalan dosing.
Aim
To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for melphalan in children with malignant diseases and to evaluate limited sampling strategies for melphalan.
Methods
Melphalan concentration data following a single intravenous dose were collected from 59 children with malignant diseases aged between 0.3 and 18 years. The data were split into two sets: the model development dataset (39 children, 571 concentration observations) and the model validation dataset (20 children, 277 concentration observations). Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed with the NONMEM software. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to develop a limited sampling model for melphalan.
Results
A two‐compartment model was fitted to the concentration‐vs.‐time data. The following covariate population pharmacokinetic models were obtained: (i) Clearance (l h−1) = 0.34.WT − 3.17.CPT + 0.0377.GFR, where WT = weight (kg), CPT = prior carboplatin therapy (0 = no, 1 = yes), and GFR = glomerular filtration rate (ml min−1 1.73 m−2); (ii) Volume of distribution (l) = 1.12 + 0.178.WT. Interpatient variability (coefficient of variation) was 27.3% for clearance and 33.8% for volume of distribution. There was insignificant bias and imprecision between observed and model‐predicted melphalan concentrations in the validation dataset. A three‐sample limited sampling model was developed which adequately predicted the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) in the development and validation datasets.
Conclusions
A population pharmacokinetic model for melphalan has been developed and validated and may now be used in conjunction with pharmacodynamic data to develop safe and effective dosing guidelines in children with malignant diseases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-5251 1365-2125 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02862.x |