Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations

Objective To assess outcomes of pacemaker upgrade from single chamber ventricular to dual chamber. Design—Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the procedure. Setting—Specialist cardiothoracic unit. Patients—44 patients (15 female, 29 male), mean (SD) age at upgrade 68.2 (12.9) years. Interv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 1998-04, Vol.79 (4), p.383-387
Hauptverfasser: Hildick-Smith, D J R, Lowe, M D, Newell, S A, Schofield, P M, Shapiro, L M, Stone, D L, Grace, A A, Petch, M C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To assess outcomes of pacemaker upgrade from single chamber ventricular to dual chamber. Design—Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the procedure. Setting—Specialist cardiothoracic unit. Patients—44 patients (15 female, 29 male), mean (SD) age at upgrade 68.2 (12.9) years. Interventions—Upgrade of single chamber ventricular to dual chamber pacemaker. Main outcome measures Procedure duration and complications. Results—Principal indications for upgrade were pacemaker syndrome (17), “opportunistic”—that is, at elective generator replacement (8), heart failure (7), non-specific breathlessness/fatigue (7), and neurally mediated syncope (3). Mean (SD) upgrade procedure duration (82.9 (32.6) minutes) significantly exceeded mean VVI implantation duration (42.9 (13.3) minutes) and mean DDD implantation duration (56.6 (22.7) minutes) (both p 
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/hrt.79.4.383