Evaluation of the Simplify d-dimer assay as a screening test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in an emergency department
Objectives: To evaluate the use in an emergency department of a new d-dimer assay (Simplify d-dimer) as a screening test for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: 187 outpatients with clinical features suspicious of acute DVT were entered into this study. A Simplify d-dimer test was performed in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2004-11, Vol.21 (6), p.663-666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: To evaluate the use in an emergency department of a new d-dimer assay (Simplify d-dimer) as a screening test for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: 187 outpatients with clinical features suspicious of acute DVT were entered into this study. A Simplify d-dimer test was performed in the emergency department on all patients. A SimpliRED d-dimer test and a semi-automated latex agglutination assay (Auto-d-dimer 700 on a Thromboscreen 400C analyser) were performed in the haematology laboratory. All patients were investigated with contrast venography to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of DVT. Results: The Simplify test had a sensitivity of 94.1% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.8%. These results compared favourably with the SimpliRED test (sensitivity 74.5%, NPV 89.7%) and the latex agglutination assay (sensitivity 90.2%, NPV 92.2%). This increased sensitivity was at the cost of a lower specificity, the specificity of the three d-dimer tests being Simplify 40.4%, SimpliRED 83.1%, and latex agglutination 43.4%. Conclusions: Simplify proved to be a rapid and easy to use test and may be useful for use in the emergency department as part of a diagnostic algorithm for deep vein thrombosis. Further larger scale studies are needed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1472-0205 1472-0213 |
DOI: | 10.1136/emj.2003.011049 |