Prediction of extubation failure in preterm infants

Objective: To identify whether the results of assessment of respiratory muscle strength or respiratory load were better predictors of extubation failure in preterm infants than readily available clinical data. Patients: Thirty six infants, median gestational age 31 (range 25–36) weeks and postnatal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition 2002-01, Vol.86 (1), p.F32-F35
Hauptverfasser: Dimitriou, G, Greenough, A, Endo, A, Cherian, S, Rafferty, G F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To identify whether the results of assessment of respiratory muscle strength or respiratory load were better predictors of extubation failure in preterm infants than readily available clinical data. Patients: Thirty six infants, median gestational age 31 (range 25–36) weeks and postnatal age 3 (1–14) days; 13 were < 30 weeks of gestational age. Methods: Respiratory muscle strength was assessed by measurement of maximum inspiratory pressure generated during airway occlusion, and inspiratory load was assessed by measurement of compliance of the respiratory system. Results: Overall, seven infants failed extubation—that is, they required reintubation within 48 hours. These infants were older (p < 0.01), had a lower gestational age (p < 0.01), and generated lower maximum inspiratory pressure (p < 0.05) than the rest of the cohort. Similar results were found in the infants < 30 weeks of gestational age. Overall and in those < 30 weeks of gestational age, gestational age and postnatal age had the largest areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves. Conclusion: In very premature infants, low gestational age and older postnatal age are better predictors of extubation failure than assessment of respiratory muscle strength or respiratory load.
ISSN:1359-2998
1468-2052
DOI:10.1136/fn.86.1.F32