Comparison of the effects of I.C.I. 50172 and propranolol on the cardiovascular responses to adrenaline, isoprenaline and exercise

1 The intravenous infusion of I.C.I. 50172 in doses up to 20 mg reduced, although not significantly, the increase in heart rate produced by the infusion of isoprenaline in healthy volunteers; the response to adrenaline was significantly reduced. The infusion of 1 mg propranolol abolished these respo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of pharmacology 1968-09, Vol.34 (1), p.127-140
Hauptverfasser: BRICK, I., HUTCHISON, K. J., McDEVITT, D. G., RODDIE, I. C., SHANKS, R. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1 The intravenous infusion of I.C.I. 50172 in doses up to 20 mg reduced, although not significantly, the increase in heart rate produced by the infusion of isoprenaline in healthy volunteers; the response to adrenaline was significantly reduced. The infusion of 1 mg propranolol abolished these responses 2 After the pre‐treatment of subjects with atropine or hexamethonium, I.C.T. 50172 produced a significant reduction in an isoprenaline tachycardia. This reduction was not competitive and did not exceed 50%. 3 The intravenous injection of 4 mg I.C.I. 50172 reduced an exercise tachycardia; its effect was less than that of 4 mg propranolol. This difference became greater as the doses of the two drugs were increased. The dextro isomer of propranolol had no effect on the exercise tachycardia; I.C.I. 45763 reduced it to the same extent as propranolol. 4 The intravenous injection of I.C.I. 50172 reduced the increase in heart rate produced by tilting a normal subject from the supine to 80° head‐up position. After the administration of atropine, I.C.I. 50172 almost abolished the response. In the presence of atropine, I.C.I. 50172 was as active as propranolol in reducing the increase in heart rate on tilting. 5 The reason for the differences in the effects of I.C.I. 50172 on the increases in heart rate brought about by the three procedures is not clear. 6 The increase in forearm blood flow produced by the infusion of isoprenaline into the brachial artery was not reduced by the intra‐arterial administration of I.C.I. 50172.
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb07956.x