Further Observations on Diagnosis and Management of General Practice Respiratory Illness using Simulated Patient Consultations

Twenty general practitioners co-operated in a study of the decision-making process in general practice respiratory illness. Ten simulated standard-patient consultations were used, each being included twice, once to make a decision on diagnosis and once to make a decision on management. Comparison of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ 1974-06, Vol.2 (5918), p.540-543
1. Verfasser: Howie, J. G. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Twenty general practitioners co-operated in a study of the decision-making process in general practice respiratory illness. Ten simulated standard-patient consultations were used, each being included twice, once to make a decision on diagnosis and once to make a decision on management. Comparison of simulated behaviour with previous studies of observed and self-recorded behaviour showed encouraging agreement. Examination of 200 pairs of management and treatment decisions showed that fewer pieces of information were required for a management than a diagnostic decision on 111 occasions; in 43 pairs the quantity required was the same for each decision. The exact information required to make a decision on diagnosis was included in the information required to decide management on only 30 (15%) of the 200 possible occasions. When disagreement was found over management of a simulated case a decision to prescribe an antibiotic required less information than a decision not to prescribe an antibiotic.
ISSN:0007-1447
0959-8138
1468-5833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.2.5918.540