Functional characterization of rat submaxillary gland muscarinic receptors using microphysiometry

Muscarinic cholinoceptors (MChR) in freshly dispersed rat salivary gland (RSG) cells were characterized using microphysiometry to measure changes in acidification rates. Several non‐selective and selective muscarinic antagonists were used to elucidate the nature of the subtypes mediating the respons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of pharmacology 2001-04, Vol.132 (7), p.1606-1614
Hauptverfasser: Meloy, Trena D, Daniels, Donald V, Hegde, Sharath S, Eglen, Richard M, Ford, Anthony P D W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Muscarinic cholinoceptors (MChR) in freshly dispersed rat salivary gland (RSG) cells were characterized using microphysiometry to measure changes in acidification rates. Several non‐selective and selective muscarinic antagonists were used to elucidate the nature of the subtypes mediating the response to carbachol. The effects of carbachol (pEC50=5.74±0.02 s.e.mean; n=53) were highly reproducible and most antagonists acted in a surmountable, reversible fashion. The following antagonist rank order, with apparent affinity constants in parentheses, was noted: 4‐DAMP (8.9)=atropine (8.9)>tolterodine (8.5)>oxybutynin (7.9)>S‐secoverine (7.2)>pirenzepine (6.9)>himbacine (6.8)>AQ‐RA 741 (6.6)>methoctramine (5.9). These studies validate the use of primary isolated RSG cells in microphysiometry for pharmacological analysis. These data are consistent with, and extend, previous studies using alternative functional methods, which reported a lack of differential receptor pharmacology between bladder and salivary gland tissue. The antagonist affinity profile significantly correlated with the profile at human recombinant muscarinic M3 and M5 receptors. Given a lack of antagonists that discriminate between M3 and M5, definitive conclusion of which subtype(s) is present within RSG cells cannot be determined. British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 132, 1606–1614; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703971
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703971