A comparison of the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐nociceptive activity of nitroaspirin and aspirin
Nitroaspirin (2.5–50 mg kg−1, i.p. or 2.5–100 mg kg−1, p.o.) and aspirin (2.5–100 mg kg−1, i.p. or p.o.) exhibit anti‐inflammatory activity in the carrageenan‐induced hindpaw oedema model in the rat. When administered i.p., nitroaspirin was a more effective anti‐oedema agent than aspirin particularl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of pharmacology 2000-01, Vol.129 (2), p.343-350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nitroaspirin (2.5–50 mg kg−1, i.p. or 2.5–100 mg kg−1, p.o.) and aspirin (2.5–100 mg kg−1, i.p. or p.o.) exhibit anti‐inflammatory activity in the carrageenan‐induced hindpaw oedema model in the rat. When administered i.p., nitroaspirin was a more effective anti‐oedema agent than aspirin particularly in the ‘early’ phase (i.e. up to 60 min) of the response. The ED50 values for nitroaspirin and aspirin as inhibitors of the ‘late’ phase response (measured at 180 min) were 64.3 μmol kg−1 and >555 μmol kg−1, respectively. When administered p.o., neither nitroaspirin nor aspirin exhibited significant anti‐inflammatory activity in the ‘early’ phase and were of similar potency in the ‘late’ phase. Thus, at the highest dose used (100 mg kg−1, 360 min) orally administered nitroaspirin (aspirin in parenthesis) inhibited oedema formation by 46.9±1.6% (47.2±3.8%, both n=6, P200 mg kg−1, p.o.) reduced the ‘late’ phase (but not the ‘early’ phase) of the formalin‐induced hindpaw licking assay in the mouse. Similarly, nitroaspirin and aspirin (>50 mg kg−1, p.o.) prolonged tail withdrawal latency following application of a noxious heat stimulus in the mouse.
British Journal of Pharmacology (2000) 129, 343–350; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703064 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1188 1476-5381 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703064 |