Interactions between loreclezole, chlormethiazole and pentobarbitone at GABAA receptors: functional and binding studies

Interations were investigated between loreclezole, chlormethiazole and pentobarbitone as potentiators of depolarization responses mediated by γ‐aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors on afferent nerve terminals in the rat cuneate nucleus in vitro. These drugs were also compared as modulators of [3H]‐f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of pharmacology 1997-07, Vol.121 (7), p.1392-1396
Hauptverfasser: Zhong, Yu, Simmonds, Michael A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Interations were investigated between loreclezole, chlormethiazole and pentobarbitone as potentiators of depolarization responses mediated by γ‐aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors on afferent nerve terminals in the rat cuneate nucleus in vitro. These drugs were also compared as modulators of [3H]‐flunitrazepam (FNZ) binding to synaptic membranes prepared from rat whole brain homogenate. In rat cuneate nucleus slices, the drugs shifted muscimol log dose–response lines to the left in an approximately parallel fashion with the result that 200 μM chlormethiazole potentiated muscimol responses by 0.567±0.037 log unit (mean±s.e.mean, n=4) while loreclezole gave a maximal potentiation at 10 μM of only 0.121±0.037 (n=6) log unit and 0.071±0.039 (n=22) at 50 μM. While 50 μM chlormethiazole and 30 μM pentobarbitone showed no significant interactions between each other when potentiating muscimol responses in combination, 50 μM loreclezole in combination with either chlormethiazole or pentobarbitone attenuated their potentiating effects, possibly by inducing desensitization of GABAA receptors. In the [3H]‐FNZ binding studies on well‐washed membranes, loreclezole enhanced binding to a maximum of 47.3±2.83% of control (mean±s.e.mean, n=3) at 300 μM. Scatchard analysis revealed no change in Bmax but a decrease in KD for [3H]‐FNZ from 3.9±0.29 nM to 2.7±0.10 nM (mean±s.e.mean, n=4) in the presence of 100 μM loreclezole. In contrast, 100 μM chlormethiazole caused no potentiation. A small component of the enhancement by loreclezole could be blocked by 100 μM bicuculline and could also be blocked by 100 μM chlormethiazole. It seems likely that the effects on [3H]‐FNZ binding are due predominantly to direct actions of the drugs on the GABAA receptor and are separate from the GABA‐potentiating effects. The results indicate distinctly different profiles of action for loreclezole, chlormethiazole and pentobarbitone on GABAA receptors.
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1038/sj.bjp.0701269