Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review

Most evaluations of new treatments use highly selected populations, making it difficult to decide whether they would work elsewhere. Systematic evaluation and reporting of applicability is required

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	BMJ 2006-08, Vol.333 (7563), p.346-349
Hauptverfasser:	Bonell, C, Oakley, A, Hargreaves, J, Strange, V, Rees, R
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Analysis and Comment Biological and medical sciences Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - methods Clinical Trials as Topic - standards Counseling Data Interpretation, Statistical Disease prevention Education Effectiveness Feasibility General aspects HIV Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Intervention Low income groups Medical sciences Medical treatment Minority & ethnic groups Miscellaneous Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Planning Prevention Program Evaluation Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Randomized controlled trials Research methodology Sexual health Sexually transmitted diseases STD Systematic review Systematic reviews Teachers Therapeutics - statistics & numerical data Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Most evaluations of new treatments use highly selected populations, making it difficult to decide whether they would work elsewhere. Systematic evaluation and reporting of applicability is required
ISSN:	0959-8138 0959-8146 0959-535X 1468-5833 1756-1833
DOI:	10.1136/bmj.333.7563.346