The Effect of Different Definitions of a Patient on Immunization Assessment

In this report, the authors compare immunization assessment using 2 definitions of a patient. Two Clinical Assessment Software Application (CASA) assessments were performed. The first sampled 200 two-year-olds seen at least once since birth. The second sampled 200 two-year-olds seen in the previous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of public health (1971) 2001-08, Vol.91 (8), p.1273-1275
Hauptverfasser: O'Connor, Mary E, Maddocks, Barbara, Modie, Cindie, Pierce, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this report, the authors compare immunization assessment using 2 definitions of a patient. Two Clinical Assessment Software Application (CASA) assessments were performed. The first sampled 200 two-year-olds seen at least once since birth. The second sampled 200 two-year-olds seen in the previous year. Children with incomplete immunizations in the first sample were contacted. In the second sample, 72% of children had complete immunizations, compared with 46% in the first sample. In the first sample, 78% of children with incomplete immunizations had not been seen during the past year. Of 134 children in the first sample seen in the past year or successfully contacted, 75% had complete immunizations. The CASA assessment's definition of a patient underestimates immunization rates.
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.91.8.1273