An attempt to analyse colour reception by electrophysiology
1. The problem of colour reception is that we do not know the action spectra of the visual pigments involved, the nature of the signals generated nor the interaction between these signals. We only know the incident light and the electric results of interaction. 2. In Part 1 we show that S-potentials...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of physiology 1966-08, Vol.185 (3), p.556-586 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. The problem of colour reception is that we do not know the action spectra of the visual pigments involved, the nature of
the signals generated nor the interaction between these signals. We only know the incident light and the electric results
of interaction.
2. In Part 1 we show that S-potentials from red/green ( R/G ) units saturated with deep red light show this property: added green light pulls down the ceiling of depolarization, but
more added red had no power to raise it again. Thus lights that depress the deep red ceiling equally stimulate the green pigment
equally. From this the action spectrum of the green pigment can be obtained.
3. If we assume that only two visual pigments are involved in the R/G unit, and that lights which do not pull down the deep red ceiling are below the threshold for green cones, then in this range
only the red pigment is excited and we may obtain its action spectrum. Its maximum is at 680 nm where no visual pigment so
far has been found.
4. In Part 2 we consider the following mathematical problem: `Is it possible that two pigments of given action spectra could
combine their outputs in such a way that the resultant would be identical with the output of a third pigment of given action
spectrum, for every intensity of every monochromatic light?' The solution shows that this is always mathematically possible,
and the necessary interaction function is deduced.
5. It is shown further that if the log action spectra are the `visual parabolas' that resemble Dartnall's nomogram, then the
interaction function is simply a linear transform such as Hartline & Ratliff (1957) have found with lateral inhibition in
Limulus and Donner & Rushton (1959) with silent substitution in the frog.
6. An interaction that matches a single pigment to perfection for all monochromatic lights will not match it for certain mixtures.
By this criterion the 680 nm excitability is a pigment and not the resultant of two other pigments, i.e. pigments more excitable
in other spectral regions.
7. In Part 3 monochromatic lights are matched by red+green mixtures that give identical responses. From this the action spectrum
of the red pigment may be obtained without involving nerve organization (except as a null detector). The result, which has
one arbitrary constant, is given by the curves of Fig. 10, the continuous curve R or one of the dotted curves. Of these only curve R is acceptable.
8. Knowing the action spectra for red and green cones we may consider what si |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
DOI: | 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008002 |