Genomic Differentiation of Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Man Allows a Fossil–DNA-Based Classification of Morphologically Indistinguishable Hominid Bones

Southern blot hybridizations of genomic DNA were introduced as a relatively simple fossil–DNA-based approach to classify remains of Neanderthals. When hybridized with genomic DNA of either human or Neanderthal origin, DNA extracted from two Neanderthal finds—the Os parietale, from Warendorf-Neuwaren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of human genetics 2000-06, Vol.66 (6), p.1927-1932
Hauptverfasser: Scholz, Michael, Bachmann, Lutz, Nicholson, Graeme J., Bachmann, Jutta, Giddings, Ian, Rüschoff-Thale, Barbara, Czarnetzki, Alfred, Pusch, Carsten M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Southern blot hybridizations of genomic DNA were introduced as a relatively simple fossil–DNA-based approach to classify remains of Neanderthals. When hybridized with genomic DNA of either human or Neanderthal origin, DNA extracted from two Neanderthal finds—the Os parietale, from Warendorf-Neuwarendorf, Germany, and a clavicula, from Krapina, Croatia—was shown to yield hybridization signals that differ by at least a factor of two compared to the signals obtained with the use of fossil DNA of an early Homo sapiens from the Vogelherd cave (Stetten I), Germany. When labeled chimpanzee DNA was used as a probe, Neanderthal and human DNA, however, revealed hybridization signals of similar intensity. Thus, the genome of Neanderthals is expected to differ significantly from the genome of anatomically modern man, because of the contrasting composition of repetitive DNA. These data support the hypothesis that Neanderthals were not ancestors of anatomically modern man.
ISSN:0002-9297
1537-6605
DOI:10.1086/302949