THE MICROANALYSIS OF FIXED-INTERVAL RESPONDING

The fixed‐interval schedule of reinforcement is one of the more widely studied schedules in the experimental analysis of behavior and is also a common baseline for behavior pharmacology. Despite many intensive studies, the controlling variables and the pattern of behavior engendered are not well understood. The present study examined the microstructure and superstructure of the behavior engendered by a fixed‐interval 5‐ and a fixed‐interval 15‐minute schedule of food reinforcement in the pigeon. Analysis of performance typical of fixed‐interval responding indicated that the scalloped pattern does not result from smooth acceleration in responding, but, rather, from renewed pausing early in the interval. Individual interresponse‐time (IRT) analyses provided no evidence of acceleration. There was a strong indication of alternation in shorter‐longer IRTs, but these shorter‐longer IRTs did not occur at random, reflecting instead a sequential dependency in successive IRTs. Furthermore, early in the interval there was a high relative frequency of short IRTs. Such a pattern of early pauses and short IRTs does not suggest behavior typical of reinforced responding as exemplified by the pattern found near the end of the interval. Thus, behavior from clearly scalloped performance can be classified into three states: postreinforcement pause, interim behavior, and terminal behavior.