REDUCING NONCOMPLIANCE TO FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT KEEPING AT A FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER

In this study, we evaluated follow‐up appointment keeping at a family practice center. To determine if noncompliance could be reduced, four treatments were implemented: no‐treatment control, modified appointment card, free follow‐up, and a reduced rate follow‐up. Thereafter, the reduced rate follow‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied behavior analysis 1984, Vol.17 (3), p.303-311
Hauptverfasser: Rice, James M., Lutzker, John R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, we evaluated follow‐up appointment keeping at a family practice center. To determine if noncompliance could be reduced, four treatments were implemented: no‐treatment control, modified appointment card, free follow‐up, and a reduced rate follow‐up. Thereafter, the reduced rate follow‐up was implemented again to determine the extent noncompliance could be reduced for all eligible patients. Incentives significantly increased follow‐up appointment keeping, whereas the modified appointment card was ineffective. A cost analysis suggested that the no‐treatment control and modified appointment card conditions were the least expensive, but also the least effective. The incentive conditions were more expensive, but the reduced rate condition generated the most net revenue. Questionnaire data suggested that the incentive conditions had an effect on noncompliance and may be considered for use in other medical settings.
ISSN:0021-8855
1938-3703
DOI:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-303