SPEED CONTINGENCIES, NUMBER OF STIMULUS PRESENTATIONS, AND THE NODALITY EFFECT IN EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION

Two experiments compared performances on conditional discrimination tasks using single‐participant designs with and without speed contingencies. Experiment 1 was a systematic replication of Spencer and Chase (1996). Experiment 2 presented equal numbers of training and testing trials. In each experiment, 2 female undergraduates participated. Each formed three five‐member and three seven‐member equivalence classes in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Response speed was an inverse function of nodal number and relational type in Experiment 1, but only of relational type (i.e., baseline, symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence) in Experiment 2, with and without the speed contingency. Accuracy tended to peak without the speed contingency in both experiments. Adding the speed contingency increased response speeds in both experiments, more so in Experiment 2 with a lower limited hold for 1 participant. The results of Experiment 2 cast doubt on previous reports of the nodality effect and on the notion of “relatedness” among class members, and they support a reinforcement‐contingency, rather than a structural, account of equivalence class formation.