RESPONSE RATE VIEWED AS ENGAGEMENT BOUTS: EFFECTS OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT AND SCHEDULE TYPE

The rate of a reinforced response is conceptualized as a composite of engagement bouts (visits) and responding during visits. Part 1 of this paper describes a method for estimating the rate of visit initiations and the average number of responses per visit from log survivor plots: the proportion of interresponse times (IRTs) longer than some elapsed time (log scale) plotted as a function of elapsed time. In Part 2 the method is applied to IRT distributions from rats that obtained food pellets by nose poking a lighted key under various multiple schedules of reinforcement. As expected, total response rate increased as a function of (a) increasing the rate of reinforcement (i.e., variable‐interval [VI] 4 min vs. VI 1 min), (b) increasing the amount of the reinforcer (one food pellet vs. four pellets), (c) increasing the percentage of reinforcers that were contingent on nose poking (25% vs. 100%), and (d) requiring additional responses after the end of the VI schedule (i.e., adding a tandem variable‐ratio [VR] 9 requirement). The first three of these variables (relative reinforcement) increased the visit‐initiation rate. The tandem VR, in contrast, increased the number of responses per visit. Thus, variables that have similar effects on total response rate can be differentiated based on their effects on the components of response rate.