A SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION OF PREFERENCES IDENTIFIED THROUGH PERSON-CENTERED PLANNING FOR PEOPLE WITH PROFOUND MULTIPLE DISABILITIES

Person‐centered planning is becoming a popular means of designing supports for people with disabilities. However, very little research evaluating person‐centered planning exists. We evaluated the degree to which items and activities reported to be preferred in person‐centered plans represented accurate preferences based on how individuals responded when presented with the items and activities. Person‐centered planning meetings were conducted with 4 individuals with profound multiple disabilities to develop preference maps and to identify leisure‐related preferences. A sample of the reported preferences in the plans was then systematically assessed by observing each participant's approach and avoidance responses to the items and activities. Of the sampled items and activities reported to be preferred in the plans, 42% represented moderate preferences based on the latter assessment process and 33% represented strong preferences. With 2 participants, several preferences identified in the plans were nonpreferred items and activities based on the preference assessments, and some were frequently avoided. These results suggested that although person‐centered plans may identify some accurate preferences for people with profound multiple disabilities, this approach should be used cautiously. Results also suggested that such plans should be supplemented with systematic preference assessments to ensure the accuracy of identified preferences. Future research areas focus on evaluating other aspects of person‐centered planning.