Effects of synaptic and antidromic stimulation on tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the rat superior cervical ganglion
1. The effects of orthodromic and antidromic stimulation of the rat superior cervical ganglion on the specific activity of the enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase have been studied. 2. Orthodromic stimulation of the ganglion via the sympathetic trunk produced an increase in the activity of tyrosine hydroxyl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of physiology 1980-03, Vol.300 (1), p.525-538 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. The effects of orthodromic and antidromic stimulation of the rat superior cervical ganglion on the specific activity of
the enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase have been studied. 2. Orthodromic stimulation of the ganglion via the sympathetic trunk produced
an increase in the activity of tyrosine hydroxylase when measured 3 days later while causing no change in the protein content
of the ganglion. This increase in the specific activity of tyrosine hydroxylase was blocked by administration of the nicotinic
antagonist, hexamethonium. 3. Antidromic stimulation of the superior cervical ganglion by stimulating the internal carotid
nerve, the external carotid nerve or both nerves simultaneously produced no change in the specific activity of tyrosine hydroxylase.
4. Parallel increases in tyrosine hydroxylase activity and protein content per ganglion were seen when the internal carotid
nerve was stimulated but similar changes were seen in "sham-stimulated" animals. These "non-specific" changes were apparently
produced by the trauma involved in the extensive dissection necessary to position electrodes on this nerve trunk. 5. We conclude
that an increase frequency of firing in post-ganglionic neurones is not a sufficient stimulus to elevate the specific activity
of tyrosine hydroxylase. Rather some other aspect of nicotinic receptor stimulation seems to be required. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
DOI: | 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013177 |